Agent-based modelling for knowledge synthesis and decision support

June 25, 2019January 21, 2020 Community Member Cases, Decision support, Integration, Methods Agent-based modelling, Author - Jen Badham, Games, Knowledge synthesis, Modelling, Participatory modelling

By Jen Badham

The most familiar models are predictive, such as those used to forecast the weather or plan the economy. However, models have many different uses and different modelling techniques are more or less suitable for specific purposes.

Here I present an example of how a game and a computerised agent-based model have been used for knowledge synthesis and decision support.

The game and model were developed by a team from the Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), a French agricultural research organisation with an international development focus. The issue of interest was land use conflict between crop and cattle farming in the Gnith community in Senegal (D’Aquino et al. 2003).

Agent-based modelling is particularly effective where understanding is more important than prediction. This is because agent-based models can represent the real world in a very natural way, making them more accessible than some other types of models. Continue reading →

Skilful conversations for integration

November 6, 2018January 14, 2020 Community Member Competencies, Integration, Methods, Participation Advocacy, Author - Liz Clarke, Author - Rebecca Freeth, Best practice, Collaboration, Dialogue, Facilitation, Interdisciplinarity (general relevance), Knowledge synthesis, Mutual learning, Productive disagreement

By Rebecca Freeth and Liz Clarke

Interdisciplinary collaboration to tackle complex problems is challenging! In particular, interdisciplinary communication can be very difficult – how do we bridge the gulf of mutual incomprehension when we are working with people who think and talk so very differently from us? What skills are required when mutual incomprehension escalates into conflict, or thwarts decision making on important issues?

It is often at this point that collaborations lose momentum. In the absence of constructive or productive exchange, working relationships stagnate and people retreat to the places where they feel safest: Continue reading →

Six strategies to ensure policies are backed by evidence

October 30, 2018December 30, 2019 Community Member Processes, Research implementation Author - Danielle Campbell, Author - Gabriel Moore, Embedding, Knowledge synthesis, Policymaking

By Danielle Campbell and Gabriel Moore

What is the best way to ensure that policies are informed by the most relevant research evidence?

Six promising strategies emerged from a rapid review of the literature (Campbell and Moore 2018). Although our focus was on health policies, the findings are likely to be more broadly applicable. An important caveat is that the number of studies to investigate these issues is small and most are descriptive rather than testing strategies. Continue reading →

A checklist for documenting knowledge synthesis

July 31, 2018December 31, 2019 Community Member Frameworks, Institutionalisation, Integration Author - Gabriele Bammer, Authorisation, Best practice, Boundaries, Collaboration, Common metric, Complexity, Dialogue, Integration and Implementation Sciences, Knowledge synthesis, Modelling, Problem definition, Research design, Scoping, Values

By Gabriele Bammer

How do you write-up the methods section for research synthesizing knowledge from different disciplines and stakeholders to improve understanding about a complex societal or environmental problem?

In research on complex real-world problems, the methods section is often incomplete. An agreed protocol is needed to ensure systematic recording of what was undertaken. Here I use a checklist to provide a first pass at developing such a protocol specifically addressing how knowledge from a range of disciplines and stakeholders is brought together.

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS CHECKLIST

1. What did the synthesis of disciplinary and stakeholder knowledge aim to achieve, which knowledge was included and how were decisions made? Continue reading →

Synthesis of knowledge about participatory modeling: How a group’s perceptions changed over time

July 3, 2018January 9, 2020 Community Member Cases, Integration, Processes Author - Rebecca Jordan, Conceptual models, Knowledge synthesis, Mental models, Modelling, Mutual learning, Participatory modelling, Partner - SESYNC, Synthesis, Visualisation

By Rebecca Jordan

How do a group’s perceptions change over time, when members across a range of institutions are brought together at regular intervals to synthesize ideas? Synthesis centers have been established to catalyze more effective cross-disciplinary research on complex problems, as described in the blog post ‘Synthesis centers as critical research infrastructure‘, by Andrew Campbell.

I co-led a group synthesizing ideas about participatory modeling as one of the activities at the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC). We met in Annapolis, Maryland, USA, four times over three years for 3-4 days per meeting. Our task was to synthesize what is known about participatory modeling tools, processes, and outcomes, especially in environmental and natural resources management contexts. Continue reading →

Two types of interdisciplinary scholarship

February 6, 2018January 14, 2020 Community Member Frameworks, Integration Author - Andi Hess, Collaboration, Incommensurability, Interdisciplinarity (specific), Knowledge synthesis, Science of team science, Teams, Terminology

By Andi Hess

Would it be helpful to identify two distinct forms of interdisciplinary scholarship ― 1) individual interdisciplinarity and 2) interdisciplinary dialogue and team science ― and to make this distinction explicit in the literature? What are the benefits and challenges of each? Are a different set of resources and methods required to achieve effective interdisciplinary scholarship?

As integration scientists are aware, there are many analyses of appropriate methods for conducting interdisciplinary work. Each has its own benefits and challenges, and each requires a different set of resources and methods for achieving effective interdisciplinary scholarship. Continue reading →

Integration and Implementation Insights

Research resources for understanding and acting on complex real-world problems

Knowledge synthesis

Agent-based modelling for knowledge synthesis and decision support

Like this:

Skilful conversations for integration

Like this:

Six strategies to ensure policies are backed by evidence

Like this:

A checklist for documenting knowledge synthesis

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS CHECKLIST

Like this:

Synthesis of knowledge about participatory modeling: How a group’s perceptions changed over time

Like this:

Two types of interdisciplinary scholarship

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

KNOWLEDGE SYNTHESIS CHECKLIST

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: