By Participants in the SESYNC Theme “Building Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team Science”
With increasing interest in online participation in workshops, meetings and classes, are there useful protocols to ensure that online participation is effective? Mixed onsite-online meetings are probably the hardest to manage well. How can you effectively include online participants, so that they don’t feel marginalized and ignored? How can you ensure that everyone has a chance to share their expertise and perspectives, and benefits fully from the meeting?
We draw on our experiences in four different interdisciplinary academic teams which held three-day meetings across wide time zones. We provide a protocol for effectively managing meetings rather than the necessary technical requirements, and welcome comments on the latter. Different technological set-ups will have different strengths and weaknesses, so some of our lessons will require modification depending on the exact circumstances. Many of our suggestions are also relevant to online only meetings.
- Ensure that the technology is up to the tasks required, especially that there is excellent audio and preferably also video.
- Ensure that a technical expert is on hand to check that everything is working properly onsite, and to help online participants handle any glitches that arise.
- Have a practice run beforehand!
- Make it easy for everyone to identify everyone else – if you don’t already know each other, consider providing:
- a list of photos and names
- large nameplates that can be read by online participants and visible name identifiers for online participants.
- Decide if any ancillary technology (eg., Google docs) will be used ahead of the meeting and make sure everyone has access to it.
- Plan small group work ahead of time and think through what’s necessary for online participants to be full members. For example, will you divide the online participants and have them join different small groups, or will they form their own small group? How will the technology work in each of those situations? Bear in mind that while two onsite small groups can work in the same room, this often does not work well when there are also online participants (see notes on soundscape below).
Tips for onsite set-up
- Ensure that the screen showing the online participants includes them in the meeting eg., don’t have onsite participants sitting with their backs to the screen.
- Delegate someone to manage what the online participants see and to use the technology to its full capacity, eg., if online participants can only see part of the meeting room, make sure the camera moves to take in where the discussion is occurring and if there is a zoom capacity, zoom in on the person speaking.
- If possible, delegate this task to a someone who is not a meeting participant, so that they can focus on it fully.
- If this task is undertaken by meeting participants, rotate it amongst the participants.
Tips for online set-up
- Ensure that your computer audio is up to the task. If it is not, invest in a microphone.
- Use headphones to enhance your ability to hear; make sure they are comfortable, especially for long meetings.
- Review how you appear on-screen. Cameras built into computers often show you at a poor angle; consider investing in a separate camera that you can look into directly. Adjust the camera distance and angle so that your face is well-centred on the screen and a good size (not too small or too large). Be aware of what viewers will see behind you
- It is harder to build relationships when you are not interacting face-to-face.
- There is often a time lag, especially when online participants speak.
Tips for onsite participants
- Make space for the online participants to contribute.
- Make eye contact with online participants as well as those onsite.
- Monitor how the online participants are going. This can be done by:
- regular check-ins, including monitoring the chat (commenting or messaging) system
- a buddy system pairing online and onsite participants, who connect during breaks and also via chat or e-mail during the meeting.
- Record shared ideas in a way that is accessible to everyone:
- use an inclusive technology eg., have someone record ideas on their computer, which is both projected into the room and screen-shared with online participants
- note that online participants generally cannot read what is written on a whiteboard or flip chart
- if you must use a white board or flip chart, delegate someone to take photos and to share them with the online participants.
- Organize a process for filling-in online participants on important onsite conversation outside the meeting eg., over dinner or lunch.
- Be mindful of the soundscape and your contribution to it. Microphones do not filter sound in the same way that your ears do. Online participants can hear everything that is happening in the room, including the side-conversations. If there are too many side conversations, clatter from cups or plates, paper shuffling, or there is background noise (machinery, for example) this is much more disruptive for online than onsite participants.
Tips for online participants
- Treat the meeting in the same way you would if you were present onsite:
- if there is a time difference, adjust your body clock and meal times
- allocate time to the meeting appropriately eg., do not try to do your day job as well as participating in the meeting
- if you cannot be present the whole time, let the chair or facilitator know.
- Become adept at muting your microphone when you are not speaking and turning it on before you do.
- Participate! Recognise that it is harder than being in the room and push yourself a little more to have your say.
- If you miss something, ask for it to be repeated.
- Liaise with the other online participants and speak up if something is not working with either the technology or the way the meeting is being run:
- the chat function is useful for checking in with other online participants.
- Be mindful of what the onsite participants can hear and see:
- if you are wearing headphones you will not hear background noise at your end and the noise may be disruptive for onsite participants
- if you eat during the meeting, mute your microphone and turn off the video.
Tips for chairs and facilitators
- Ensure that the tips above are implemented.
- Ensure that the times listed on the agenda reflect all the times zones across which the meetings is held.
- Be clear about how you want to manage the flow of conversation and turn-taking. Make sure it works for the online participants eg., if you want people to raise their hands, make sure you can see when online participants have their hands raised.
- Do not try to do everything yourself, eg., get others onsite and online to monitor when people want to speak and how the meeting is going.
- Alternate between online and onsite participants when calling on people to speak.
- Invite everyone to reflect on the process at the end of the meeting to build additional learnings.
What has your experience been with mixed onsite and online meetings? Do you have additional tips to share? Do you have examples of when things have worked well and when they have gone badly, along with lessons learnt?
Authors: We are a subgroup of the members of the theme Building Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team Science supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) in Annapolis, Maryland, USA. For all but one of us, clicking on our names in the author list below will provide links to other blog posts we have written for this blog, along with our biographical details. An additional biography and two updated affiliations are also provided.
The combined image of all the authors can also be opened via the this link (PDF 192KB).
Top row (left to right): Gabriele Bammer, Sondoss Elsawah, Pierre Glynn, Joseph Guillaume
Second row (left to right): David Hawthorne, Antonie Jetter, Rebecca Jordan
Third row (left to right): Kirsten Kainz, Bethany Laursen, Allison Metz, Graeme Nicholas
Second last row (left to right): Michael Paolisso, Katrin Prager, Laura Schmitt-Olabisi
Last row (left to right): Val Snow, Eleanor Sterling, Cristina Zurbriggen
Additional biography: Pierre Glynn PhD heads the Hydro-Ecological Interactions Branch in the Water Mission Area at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). He also serves as the Water Mission Area representative to the USGS Science and Decisions Center.
Graeme Nicholas is now a consultant.
Katrin Prager is now in the Geography & Environment Department, University of Aberdeen, UK.
14 thoughts on “Effectively including online participants in onsite meetings”
Thank you for this detailed blog, we at Future Earth will find this useful as we navigate an increasingly online world. There is a lot to think about too in terms of effective participation for those without an internet connection/data source, or even a computer.
Thanks to the group, fun to see such a collective writing, good modelling! I posted on the topic here, with some resources as well. Thank you Gabriele for linking, sharing and facilitating connections. https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/a-few-resources-on-use-of-ict-and-teamwork-that-can-help-mental-health-workers-teams-with-practice-changes/
Some tech-related considerations as well. Best to make sure your conferencing platform is accessible to everyone – some platforms may be blocked in other countries.
If group diagramming is one of the activities then a collaborative editing platform, e.g. Google Docs or Diagrams (https://www.diagrams.net), may be useful compared to the often used “camera pointed at whiteboard” approach as this allows virtual participants to directly contribute.
Lastly, having a second screen for your laptop is really handy!
Just discovered this great tool: a digital workspace for visual collaboration – http://www.mural.co. Haven’t used it yet but I think it will let me replicate online a module on teamwork and team management with my students which I previously thought there is no way to have this without face to face interaction. Accompanying webinar and support material reiterate key tasks for workshop preparation, design and excellent facilitation.
@Katrin: Yes! Mural looks like a lot of fun. Here are several other collaboration platforms that may have visual components: https://www.capterra.com/collaboration-software/
Running effective meetings with online participants (or all online meetings) require more effort to set up and prepare well. But taking on board the suggestions in this post can make them just as productive and teaches us to be more mindful of what others have to say. I’m starting to think that relationship building might even be possible without face-to-face interaction. Wouldn’t it be great if we can (re)train ourselves now so that once COVID-19 is passed we continue making best use of online meetings and reduce our travel impact, in academia and beyond?
Recently, I’ve seen academic twitter raise concerns about the marginalizing effect of in-person conferences. People with limited funds, health issues, and family responsibilities might not be able to travel (especially internationally) to attend conferences. Perhaps the ideas contained within this blog can support new ways of gathering around scientific and policy work so that a greater number of people (viewpoints) can contribute to the conversation.
Thanks for this post! Very timely, as my faculty were just having an email discussion this afternoon about how to handle thesis/dissertation defenses virtually. We all use videoconferencing in a variety of ways, but are really concerned about it being a good experience for our students. I have forwarded this link and recommended these best practices be followed.
Great – thanks for letting us know!
One thing that I would like to add is that in free-flowing discussions it can be difficult to break into the conversation with your perspective even when onsite – being offsite magnifies this difficulty and the conversation can move on before you have contributed. One tip here is that if you have something to contribute but have been unable to break into the conversation at the right time, recording your thoughts in the video conference’s messaging system can be effective.
Thanks for this instructive post and thank you Val for the tip! I’ll keep in mind to also explicitly encourage participants to use such tools for asynchronous contributions and to explain them how to do so.
Thank you Sibylle – it is pleasing to know that this might be helpful elsewhere.
@Val, yes, breaking into free flowing discussion is difficult whether on-site or off-site. This has a strong marginalizing effect on many different kinds of people whose perspectives we need. That’s why I’m with Keith McCandless (Liberating Structures) and others who strongly recommend adding additional structure to the conversation so it doesn’t become a “goat rodeo.” Even adding the simple “round table” or “go around” structure can greatly level the playing field for all participants. The chat function in Zoom or Skype is a start but it is easy to ignore or forget–even if there is a dedicated “liaison” from on-site to on-line. But, I’ve noticed academics strongly resist any structure other than free flowing discussion. Why is that?