Integration and Implementation Insights

Three principles for co-designing intervention strategies

By David Lam

author-david-lam
David Lam (biography)

What processes are involved when researchers and local actors co-design context-specific intervention strategies? This ‘how to’ knowledge is outlined in the three principles described below. Local actors can include non-governmental organisations, local leaders, community groups and individual activists.

Principle 1. Explore existing and envisioned initiatives fostering change towards the desired future 

This has 3 key steps:

  1. Identifying existing initiatives and knowledge working towards the desired future
  2. Identifying who is involved and leading different existing initiatives
  3. Analysing how existing and possible future initiatives from local actors contribute to changing the state of system elements that need to change for reaching the desired vision or up to an intermediate state.

Key issues are:

Principle 2. Frame the intervention strategy to bridge the gap between the present state and desired future state(s), building on, strengthening and complementing existing initiatives

This has two key steps:

  1. Analysing which measures are missing to change neglected system elements of the vision (eg for sustainability)
  2. Framing the intervention strategy in a way that bridges the gap between the present state and desired future state(s).

Key issues are:

Principle 3. Identify drivers, barriers and potential leverage points for how to accelerate progress towards the desired vision

This has two key steps:

  1. Relying on the experience and knowledge of identified local actors of change in their present and envisioned efforts to attain the desired vision
  2. Drawing out envisioned drivers, barriers and potential leverage points for the codesigned intervention strategy.

Key issues are:

Conclusion

These three principles facilitate the process of co-designing modular, organic and bottom up intervention strategies. They can be used in conjunction with top-down approaches. When top-down approaches are lacking, the principles can help empower local actors by building social capital and capacity; strengthening legitimacy, ownership and accountability for the intervention strategy; and mobilising networks of change agents.

What are your experiences with intervention strategies that integrate the work and knowledge from local actors? The idea of reflecting on drivers and barriers with a leverage points perspective is quite new. What are your thoughts on this?

To find out more:

Lam, D. P. M., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., Fischer, J., Peukert, D. and Lang, D. J. (2019). Three principles for co-designing sustainability intervention strategies: Experiences from Southern Transylvania. Ambio. (Online) (Open access): http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13280-019-01302-x

Biography: David P. M. Lam is a PhD candidate at Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany where he worked in the research project Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation. Until recently he was a visiting guest researcher at Universidad Nacional Autonóma de México (UNAM) in Morelia, Mexico. His research focuses on (1) amplification processes to scale the impact of local initiatives that foster sustainability transformations, and (2) the role of different knowledge systems in sustainability transformations research, such as the ones pertaining to indigenous peoples and local communities.

Exit mobile version