Toolkits for transdisciplinary research

Community member post by Gabriele Bammer

Gabriele Bammer (biography)

If you want to undertake transdisciplinary research, where can you find relevant concepts and methods? Are there compilations or toolkits that are helpful?

I’ve identified eight relevant toolkits, which are described briefly below and in more detail in the journal GAIA’s Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity series.

One toolkit provides concepts and methods relevant to the full range of transdisciplinary research, while the others cover four key aspects: (i) collaboration, (ii) synthesis of knowledge from relevant disciplines and stakeholders, (iii) thinking systemically, and (iv) making change happen.

Full range of transdisciplinary research
1. Research integration and implementation

2. Collaboration

Synthesis of knowledge from relevant disciplines and stakeholders
3. Co-producing knowledge
4. Dialogue methods for knowledge synthesis
5. Integration methods

Thinking systemically
6. (Dynamic) systems thinking

Making change happen
7. Engaging and influencing policy
8. Change

Of the eight toolkits, two – on knowledge co-production and on integration – were developed by transdisciplinary researchers. The others were developed in different contexts but still include many methods that transdisciplinarians will find useful.

1. Research integration and implementation

The Integration and Implementation Sciences (I2S) website provides more than 100 tools, approaches and cases relevant to research integration and implementation. They deal with:

  1. synthesis of knowledge from different disciplines and stakeholders
  2. understanding and managing unknowns
  3. providing integrated research support for policy and practice change.


2. Collaboration

Practical guidance is provided on collaboration in research teams, including those which strive for high levels of integration. The toolkit is divided into nine sections:

  1. preparing to collaborate
  2. building a research team
  3. fostering trust
  4. developing a shared vision
  5. communicating about science
  6. sharing recognition and credit
  7. handling conflict
  8. strengthening team dynamics
  9. navigating and leveraging networks and systems.

Reference: Bennett, L. M., Gadlin, H. and Levine-Finley, S. (2010). Collaboration and team science: A field guide. National Institutes of Health Publication, 10-7660. National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, United States of America. Online (open access):

3. Co-producing knowledge

The td-net toolbox for co-producing knowledge provides 14 methods for bringing together different perspectives on a problem, recognising that both individuals and social groups have different ways of thinking about issues. The methods deal with ways of:

  1. tailoring research questions
  2. identifying relevant ‘actors’
  3. constructing groups
  4. sharing and consolidating expert and/or non-expert knowledge and perspectives
  5. constructing a timeline of significant events
  6. planning possible futures
  7. challenging suggested solutions
  8. identifying impacts.


4. Dialogue methods for knowledge synthesis

Fourteen dialogue methods to bring together disciplinary experts and/or stakeholders are described, along with case studies of applications in four research areas: environment, population health, security and technological innovation. The methods deal with ways of understanding and combining:

  1. judgements
  2. visions
  3. assumptions
  4. interests
  5. values.

Reference: McDonald, D., Bammer, G. and Deane. P. (2009). Research integration using dialogue methods. ANU Press: Canberra, Australia. Online (open access):

5. Integration methods

Integration is essential in transdisciplinary research, with seven groups of integration methods:

  1. Integration through conceptual clarification and theoretical framing
  2. Integration through research questions and hypothesis formulation
  3. Screening, using, refining, and further developing effective integrative scientific methods
  4. Integrative assessment procedures
  5. Integration through development and application of models
  6. Integration through artifacts, services and products as boundary objects
  7. Integrative procedures and instruments of research organisation

Reference: Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W., Pohl, C. and Schramm, E. (2012). Methods for transdisciplinary research: A primer for practice. Campus Verlag: Frankfurt am Main // German version: Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung:
Ein Überblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen. Published in 2010. See also Matthias Bergmann’s blog post.

6. (Dynamic) systems thinking

Transdisciplinary research often requires systems thinking, especially understanding how the inter-related elements of a problem form a complex and unified whole, and how those interdependencies influence the actions that can be taken. Seven how-to guides provide an introduction to systems thinking tools, especially for understanding dynamic systems. Several focus on systems archetypes, which are distinctive combinations of reinforcing and balancing processes found in many kinds of organisations, under many circumstances, and at many levels and scales. They are:

  1. Introduction to systems thinking
  2. Systems thinking tools: a user’s reference guide
  3. System archetypes basics: from story to structure
  4. Systems archetypes I: diagnosing systemic issues and designing interventions
  5. Systems archetypes II: using systems archetypes to take effective action
  6. Systems archetypes III: understanding patterns of behaviour and delay
  7. Applying systems archetypes


7. Engaging and influencing policy

This guide provides a general approach and specific methods addressing how researchers can effectively interact with policy makers. It is based on the extensive experience of the Research in Policy and Development (RAPID) programme of the UK Overseas Development Institute. The toolkit provides guidance in three areas:

  1. Diagnosing the problem: understanding root causes rather than symptoms, understanding why the problem persists, diagnosing complexity and uncertainty, and identifying stakeholders.
  2. Developing an engagement strategy to influence policy: identifying realistic outcomes, identifying who or what is to be influenced, developing a theory of change, developing and implementing a communications strategy, and assessing the available capacity and resources.
  3. Developing a monitoring and learning plan: defining information requirements, collecting and managing data, and making sense of data to improve decision-making.

Reference: Young, J., Shaxson, L., Jones, H., Hearn, S., Datta, A. and Cassidy, C. (2014). Rapid Outcome Mapping Approach: A Guide to Policy Engagement and Influence. Overseas Development Institute (ODI): London, UK. Online (PDF and workbook):

8. Change

More than 120 techniques aimed at achieving change are presented, many of which can be adapted for transdisciplinary research. There are three major sections covering change at the following levels:

  1. Personal, in two groups: goals and creativity, and personal growth
  2. Team, in two groups: different perceptions of reality (maps) and team learning
  3. Larger systems, in six groups: organisational analysis; vision, values and goals; planning and project management; understanding clients and stakeholders; systems thinking, and large systems change.

Reference: Nauheimer, H. (1997). The change management toolbook. A collection of tools, methods and strategies. Online (open access PDF and online version with additional more recent tools):

Do you have useful tools or toolkits to share?

To find out more, see Toolkits for transdisciplinarity:
Toolkit #1 – Co-producing knowledge. GAIA, 24, 3: 149. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.24.3.2
Toolkit #2 – Engaging and influencing policy. GAIA, 24, 4: 221. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.24.4.2
Toolkit #3 – Dialogue methods for knowledge synthesis. GAIA, 25, 1: 7. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.25.1.3
Toolkit #4 – Collaboration. GAIA, 25, 2: 77. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.25.2.2
Toolkit #5 – Change. GAIA, 25, 3: 149. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.25.3.2
Toolkit #6 – Research integration and implementation. GAIA, 25, 4: 229. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.25.4.2
Toolkit #7 – (Dynamic) systems thinking. GAIA, 26, 1: 7. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.26.1.3
Toolkit #8 – Integration Methods. GAIA, 26, 2: 79. Online (DOI): 10.14512/gaia.26.2.3

Biography: Gabriele Bammer PhD is a professor at The Australian National University in the Research School of Population Health’s National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health. She is developing the new discipline of Integration and Implementation Sciences (I2S) to improve research strengths for tackling complex real-world problems through synthesis of disciplinary and stakeholder knowledge, understanding and managing diverse unknowns and providing integrated research support for policy and practice change. She leads the theme “Building Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team Science” at the US National Socio-environmental Synthesis Center.

Scaling up amidst complexity

Community member post by Ann Larson

Ann Larson (biography)

How can new or under-utilized healthcare practices be expanded and institutionalized to achieve audacious and diverse global health outcomes, ranging from eliminating polio to reversing the rise in non-communicable diseases? How can complex adaptive systems with diverse components and actors interacting in multiple ways with each other and the external environment best be dealt with? What makes for an effective scale-up effort?

Four in-depth case studies of scale-up efforts were used to explore if there were different pathways to positively change a complex adaptive system. Continue reading

Dealing with deep uncertainty: Scenarios

Laura Schmitt Olabisi (biography)

Community member post by Laura Schmitt Olabisi

What is deep uncertainty? And how can scenarios help deal with it?

Deep uncertainty refers to ‘unknown unknowns’, which simulation models are fundamentally unsuited to address. Any model is a representation of a system, based on what we know about that system. We can’t model something that nobody knows about—so the capabilities of any model (even a participatory model) are bounded by our collective knowledge.

One of the ways we handle unknown unknowns is by using scenarios. Scenarios are stories about the future, meant to guide our decision-making in the present. Continue reading

The integrative role of landscape

Community member post by David Brunckhorst, Jamie Trammell and Ian Reeve

David Brunckhorst (biography)

Landscapes are the stage for the theatre of human-nature interactions. What does ‘landscape’ mean and what integrative function does it perform?

What is landscape?

Consider a painting of a landscape or look out a window. We imagine, interpret and construct an image of the ‘landscape’ that we see. It’s not surprising that landscapes (like the paintings of them) are valued through human perceptions, and evolve through closely interdependent human-nature relationships. Landscapes are co-constructed by society and the biophysical environment. Landscape change is, therefore, a continuous reflection of the evolving coupled responses of environment and institutions. Landscapes are especially meaningful to those who live in them. Continue reading

What makes a translational ecologist? Part 1: Knowledge

Community member post by the Translational Ecology Group 

Translational Ecology Group (participants)


Four related blog posts on translational ecology:

Introduction to translational ecology

What makes a translational ecologist – Part 1: Knowledge (this post) / Part 2: Skills / Part 3: Dispositional attributes

What does it take for ecologists to become more effective in informing and supporting policy and practice change? What are the competencies underpinning the new discipline of translational ecology? What needs to be covered in graduate courses on translational ecology?

A group of us, supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), have been addressing these questions. As well as defining translational ecology, we have developed a matrix covering relevant knowledge, skills and, what we call, dispositional attributes or personal characteristics. We deal with each of these in four related blog posts, as described in the right sidebar.

We argue that knowledge is required in three major areas:

  1. Socio-ecological systems
  2. Communication across boundaries, with beneficiaries, stakeholders and other scientists
  3. Engagement with beneficiaries, stakeholders and other scientists.

Continue reading

Modeling as empowerment

Community member post by Laura Schmitt Olabisi

Laura Schmitt Olabisi (biography)

Who can make systems change? The challenges of complexity are intensely felt by those who are trying to make strategic interventions in coupled human-environmental systems in order to fulfill personal, societal, or institutional goals. The activists, leaders, and decision-makers I work with often feel overwhelmed by trying to deal with multiple problems at once, with limited time, resources, and attention. We need tools to help leaders cut through the complexity so that they can identify the most effective strategies to make change.

This is where participatory system dynamics modelers like myself come in. Continue reading